Source of this article: Medscape.com
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/534041
Evidence-Based Review of Nursing Interventions to Prevent
Secondary Disabilities in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum
Disorder
Linda
M. Caley; Nancy Shipkey; Theresa Winkelman; Christine Dunlap; Sara Rivera
Pediatr
Nurs. 2006;32(2):155-162. ©2006 Jannetti Publications, Inc.
Posted
07/06/2006
Fetal alcohol spectrum
disorder (FASD), an umbrella term used to describe the constellation of effects
that occur because of prenatal alcohol exposure, is a serious and widespread
problem. First described in 1973 as fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), a great deal
is now known about prenatal alcohol exposure and its prevalence. Children with
FAS represent only a portion of children exposed prenatally to alcohol. Research
has documented a spectrum of effects of prenatal alcohol exposure, and multiple
terms have been developed to cover the different effects. Recently, governmental
and advocacy organizations in the United States and Canada developed a consensus
definition to cover the multiple terms previously used including fetal alcohol
syndrome (FAS), alcohol related neurodevelopmental disabilities (ARND), fetal
alcohol effects (FAE), alcohol related birth defects (ARBD), and partial fetal
alcohol syndrome (PFAS). The Consensus Statement is as follows:
Fetal
alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is an umbrella term describing the range of
effects that can occur in an individual whose mother drank alcohol during
pregnancy. These effects may include physical, mental, behavioral, and/or
learning disabilities with possible lifelong implications. The term FASD is not
intended for use as a clinical diagnosis (Bertrand et al., 2004, p. iv).
Guidelines (Bertrand et al.,
2004) giving specific criteria for referral and diagnosis of FAS versus other
problems due to prenatal alcohol exposure can be found at the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Web site: www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/fas/faspub.htm.
FASD is the leading known
preventable cause of mental retardation in western civilization and one common
reason a child's development and learning is affected. The need to address the
prevention of secondary disabilities caused by prenatal alcohol exposure has
become a national priority (CDC, 2002). Secondary disabilities are those not
present at birth but that occur because of the primary disability. Research has
demonstrated that secondary disabilities associated with FASD can be prevented
or lessened by a better understanding and appropriate interventions
(Streissguth, Barr, Kogan, & Bookstein, 1996).
Nurses encounter children
and families throughout all parts of their lifespan who are at risk for or who
have FASD, and nursing interventions are key to the prevention and treatment of
this problem. Secondary and tertiary nursing interventions have proven to
prevent secondary disabilities and enhance outcomes for high-risk children in
multiple research studies (see Alexander, Younger, Cohen, & Crawford, 1988;
Brooten et al., 1988; Brooten et al., 1986; Brooten et al., 1994; Lipman, 1988;
Melnyk et al., 2001; Olds, Henderson, Chamberlin, & Tatelbaum, 1986;
Weisman, 1992). While many of the interventions in these studies apply to
children and families with FASD, we only included those strategies specifically
aimed at children and families with FASD in this review.
We undertook this review to
answer the question, "What is the state of the evidence for nursing
interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in children and families
affected by FASD?" This was a necessary first step prior to developing
effective interventions in this area. According to van Meijel, Gamel, van
Swieten-Duijfjes, and Grypodonck (2004), identification of existing intervention
practices is an extremely valuable and necessary aspect of developing
evidence-based interventions.
This review followed the
method described by Garrard (1999) in Health Sciences Literature Review Made
Easy: The Matrix Method. Garrard's method describes steps for planning and
managing the search of the literature, selecting and organizing documents for
review, abstracting and synthesizing the findings. Some common terms used to
conduct such a review are shown in Table
1 .
A preliminary search
identified no previous review of nursing interventions for preventing secondary
disabilities in FASD. Therefore, a wide net was cast in undertaking this search
to identify articles or research studies written by nurses or in the nursing
literature about FASD. Three of the authors, the reference librarian at the
University at Buffalo, and staff from the SAMHSA Center for Excellence on FASD
all conducted searches for articles between 1980 through 2004 using Journals at
Ovid, CINAHL, Medline, PsychInfo, Cochrane Reviews, the metasearch engine
Dogpile, and Digital Dissertations. The search terms included fetal alcohol
syndrome, fetal alcohol effects, alcohol related neurological disorders, FASD,
nursing interventions, prevention, secondary disabilities, foster care,
questionnaires, and surveys. The search yielded 1,090 references. Endnote
Reference Manager Software was used to capture the article information.
References were exported to
Microsoft Excel and abstracted in two rounds. Three of the authors reviewed the
articles separately. All members of the team were pediatric or school nurse
practitioners (PNP/SNP) or PNP students enrolled in a graduate nursing program
who had successfully completed the research course requirements for their
respective graduate program.
In round one, the articles
were coded for the profession they were written by or aimed at by reading the
abstract. The codes were: 1.1 nursing, 1.2 health professionals, 1.3 social
workers, 1.4 juvenile justice, 1.5 foster care, 1.6 other, and 1.7 non human
studies. If at least two of the three coders agreed that an article was written
by or was specifically aimed at nurses, contained nursing interventions for
FASD, or addressed health professionals in general, it was included in the next
round for abstraction. If there was any doubt the article met the criteria, it
was included for abstraction. This resulted in 110 references chosen for
abstracting.
In round two, the remaining
110 references were read completely for abstraction. During this process, 46
were further excluded due to inability to obtain the full article, inability to
translate the article from the language in which it was written, or the fact
that there was no actual information in the article about FASD. Articles written
before 1990 were eliminated since many contained information no longer
considered relevant given the latest research or were not consistent with recent
guidelines (Bertrand et al., 2004). Sixty-four references remained for
abstraction.
To abstract the data from
the remaining articles, a review matrix was set up in Microsoft Excel. The
matrix included a summary of the article; whether it was research and, if so,
what type of research; if it included nursing interventions; if those
interventions were aimed at preventing secondary disabilities; and the type of
intervention recommended.
The type of nursing
intervention recommended was identified using a model developed by Keller,
Strohschein, Lia-Hoagberg, and Schaffer (1998). In Public Health
Interventions - Applications for Public Health Nursing (Public Health
Nursing Section, 2001), Keller et al. describe three levels of nursing
intervention: community-focused, systems-focused, and individual/family-focused.
Community-focused
practice changes community norms, community attitudes, community awareness,
community practices, and community behaviors and is directed toward entire
populations within the community or occasionally toward target groups within
those populations. Systems-focused practice changes organizations, policies,
laws, and power structures. The focus is not directly on individuals and
communities but on the systems that impact health. Individual-focused practice
changes knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, practices, and behaviors of individuals.
This practice level is directed at individuals, alone or as part of a family,
class, or group. (p. 4-5)
At each of those levels, the authors identify 17 possible types of interventions grouped together by those interventions frequently implemented together. For example, health teaching and counseling often occur together in consultation with other professionals. Figure 1, adapted from their model, shows the levels of intervention as well as the types of interventions.
Figure
1.
Population-Based Pubic Health Interventions. Note: Adapted with permission, by Caley Design (2005), from the Public Health Nursing Section: Public Health Interventions-Applications for Public Health Nursing Practice (2001). |
Once abstracted, the data
was analyzed by type of reference and type of intervention to identify themes
that emerged about nursing interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in
FASD.
Of the 64 references, 28
contained recommendations for nursing interventions to prevent secondary
disabilities. Four of these references were research based (Clement-Murphy,
2001; Free, Russell, Mills, & Hathaway, 1990; Gardner, 2000; Hess, 1996) and
could be considered level VI evidence, that is evidence from a single
descriptive or qualitative study (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2005). The
research studies are summarized in Table
2 .
Twenty-four references were
Level VII evidence, opinion of authorities. There were no systematic reviews or
meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or evidence-based clinical
practice guidelines (Level I). There were no RCTs (Level II), well-designed
controlled trials without randomization (Level III), or well-designed
case-control and cohort studies (Level IV) (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt,
2005).
The findings from the
literature are synthesized below by categories and type of intervention.
Referral and Follow-up.
Referral and follow-up interventions assist individuals, families, groups,
organizations, and communities to utilize necessary resources to prevent or
resolve problems or concerns. Referral and follow-up most often follow the
implementation of another intervention, such as health teaching, counseling,
delegated functions, consultation, screening, and case-finding. It also is an
important component of case management. On occasion, it is implemented in
conjunction with advocacy (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 80).
Referral was the most
recommended nursing intervention, mentioned in 24 of the articles (Applebaum,
1995; Clement-Murphy, 2001; Cramer & Davidhizar, 1999; D'Apolito, 1998;
Dempster, 1996; Dychkowski, 2000; Eliason & Williams, 1990; Eustace, Kang,
& Coombs, 2003; Fitzgerald, 1999; Free et al., 1990; Gardner, 2000; Hess,
1996; Hess & Kenner, 1998; Hogan, 1992; Kenner & D'Apolito, 1997;
Kenner, Dreyer, & Amlung, 2000; Oklahoma State Nurses Association, 1997;
Redding, 1992; Redding & Selleck, 1993; Remkes, 1993; Robinson, 1999; Savage
et al., 2003; Smitherman, 1994; Wekselman, Spiering, Hetteberg, Kenner, &
Flandermeyer, 1995). References mentioned 12 different types of referrals
necessary: (a) early intervention services (12 articles), (b) referral of mother
to alcohol treatment programs (8 articles), (c) counseling and support groups (6
articles), (d) interdisciplinary teams or specialist in FAS (7 articles), (e)
follow-up care for developmental delay (4 articles), and (f) respite care (3
articles). Additional recommendations included referral to community services,
crisis management, child welfare, public health nurses, therapeutic childcare,
and agencies that monitor the home environment.
Case Management.
Case management interventions optimize self-care capabilities of individuals and
families and the capacity of systems and communities to coordinate and provide
services (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001 p. 93).
Ten references recommended
case management (Clement-Murphy, 2001; Cramer & Davidhizar, 1999; Dempster,
1996; Eliason & Williams, 1990; Fitzgerald, 1999; Hawke, 2002; Hess &
Kenner, 1998; Redding, 1992; Remkes, 1993; Wekselman et al., 1995), although the
exact recommendations were different in each one. The recommendations fell into
two categories: general recommendations and nursing specific recommendations.
General recommendations included case management for financial assistance,
resources available, medical, educational services, physical therapy, speech,
behavioral care, and social needs. Nursing specific recommendations included the
nurses' responsibility for coordination of services, discharge planning, and
assuring access to care and continuity of services.
Delegated Functions.
Delegated functions are direct care tasks that a registered professional nurse
carries out under the authority of a health care practitioner, as allowed by
law. Delegated functions also include any direct care tasks a registered
professional nurse entrusts to other appropriate personnel to perform (Public
Health Nursing Section, 2001 p. 113). There were no recommendations related to
delegated functions.
Screening, case-finding,
outreach, surveillance, and disease and other health event investigations often
are implemented together. Case-finding is closely linked with screening of
individuals and families and the two terms are sometimes used interchangeably
(Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 56).
Screening.
Screening interventions identify individuals with unrecognized health risk
factors or asymptomatic disease conditions in populations. The Public Health
Nursing Section (2001) identifies three types of screening described in the
literature: mass, targeted, and periodic. The recommendations for screening in
this review fall mainly into the category of targeted screening at the
individual level.
Twenty references mentioned
screening as an intervention to prevent secondary disabilities (Applebaum, 1995;
Clement-Murphy, 2001; D'Apolito, 1998; Dempster, 1996; Dychkowski, 2000; Eliason
& Williams, 1990; Eustace, 2000; Fitzgerald, 1999; Gardner, 2000; Hawke,
2002; Hess & Kenner, 1998; Hogan, 1992; Kenner & D'Apolito, 1997;
Oklahoma State Nurses Association, 1997; Redding, 1992; Redding & Selleck,
1993; Remkes, 1993; Savage et al., 2003; Smitherman, 1994; Wekselman et al.,
1995). The majority of articles (14) suggested screening of women, especially
alcoholic mothers, as a first step toward identifying an infant at risk for
FASD. One article specifically suggested screening in homeless shelters. Three
articles recommended screening infants for delay/neurodevelopmental delay,
growth retardation, or physical abnormalities. Other recommendations included
the use of developmental evaluations, specifically the Denver Developmental Test
and the use of physical and laboratory data such as urine drug screens and
meconium testing.
Case-finding.
Case-finding interventions locate individuals and families with identified risk
factors and connect them to resources. It often leads to referral and follow-up.
Eleven references
recommended case-finding (Applebaum, 1995; Clement-Murphy, 2001; D'Apolito,
1998; Dempster, 1996; Eustace et al., 2003; Fitzgerald, 1999; Gardner, 2000;
Hess & Kenner, 1998; Kenner & D'Apolito, 1997; Smitherman, 1994;
Wekselman et al., 1995). Specific recommendations included case-finding in
homeless centers and in families who adopted children or are providing foster
care and keeping a high level of suspicion for FAS in adolescents and adults
with developmental disabilities, attention deficits, or conduct disorders.
Outreach.
Outreach interventions locate populations-of-interest or populations-at-risk and
provide information about the nature of the concern, what can be done about it,
and how services can be obtained (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 41).
Six references contained
recommendations for outreach (Applebaum, 1995; Clement-Murphy, 2001; Eustace et
al., 2003; Fitzgerald, 1999; Hawke, 2002; Kenner & D'Apolito, 1997).
Recommendations fell into two categories. The first was outreach to the
community at large through education, and to teenagers, those in homeless
shelters, and women with drinking problems. The second was outreach to
professionals, specifically obstetrical and pediatric physicians, and to
clinics.
Disease and Other Health
Event Investigation.
Disease and other health event investigation interventions systematically gather
and analyze data regarding threats to the health of populations, ascertains the
source of the threat, identifies cases and others at risk, and determines
control measures. The threats may be actual or potential. The investigative
process consists of identifying and verifying the source of the threat;
identifying cases, their contacts, and others at risk; determining control
measures; and communicating with the public, as needed (Public Health Nursing
Section, 2001, p. 29). There were no recommendations in this area.
Surveillance.
Surveillance activities describe and monitor health events through ongoing and
systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data for the
purpose of planning, implementing, and evaluating public health interventions
(Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 13). There were no recommendations in
this area.
Health Teaching.
Health teaching interventions communicate facts, ideas, and skills that change
knowledge, attitudes, values, beliefs, behaviors, and practices and skills of
individuals, families, systems, and/or communities (Public Health Nursing
Section, 2001, p. 121).
Eleven references
recommended specific types of health teaching for parents who have a child with
FASD as a means of preventing secondary disabilities (Clement-Murphy, 2001;
Cramer & Davidhizar, 1999; Fitzgerald, 1999; Free et al., 1990; Gardner,
2000; Hess & Kenner, 1998; Kenner & D'Apolito, 1997; Kenner et al.,
2000; Redding & Selleck, 1993; Robinson, 1999; Wekselman et al., 1995).
The most frequently
mentioned example of teaching was teaching parents strategies that work with
children with FASD. Examples mentioned more than once were the need to teach
parents: (a) how to provide a safe environment, (b) behavior management
strategies, (c) growth and development, (d) how to recognize the infants
behavioral cues to promote parent-infant interaction, (e) how to provide sensory
integration, and (f) ways to build on the child's strengths by rewarding even
the smallest steps taken. Several references recommended teaching the following
related to understanding the diagnosis: (a) FASD is brain damage, (b) realistic
expectations, and (c) that getting a diagnosis of FASD may help the family get
needed services to prevent secondary disabilities. One author mentioned that
helping the family see that they were going to have to change their lifestyle
was the key to living successfully with this diagnosis.
The second type of
recommendation for health teaching relates to helping parents learn strategies
to help the child maintain control and regain it again when necessary. The
recommendations included (a) developing routines, (b) alerting the child to
changes in routines before they happen, (c) calming techniques such as providing
physical comfort through a back rub and time out, (d) verbally redirecting the
child and any negative behavior, (e) attaining eye contact, and (f) giving the
child a neutral place to work through anger such as a bean bag or large cushion.
Additional recommendations included helping parents learn how to deal with sleep
disturbances and what community resources were available.
Counseling.
Counseling interventions establish an interpersonal relationship with a
community, system, family, or individual intended to increase or enhance their
capacity for self-care and coping (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 151).
Six references recommended
counseling (Applebaum, 1995; Cramer & Davidhizar, 1999; Fitzgerald, 1999;
Free et al., 1990; Smitherman, 1994; Wekselman et al., 1995). Recommendations
for families included crisis management and group sessions. For children,
counseling was recommended to help them deal with feelings and fears and to
strengthen coping strategies.
Consultation.
Consultation seeks information and generates optional solutions to perceived
problems or issues through interactive problem-solving with a community, system,
family, or individual. The community, system, family, or individual selects and
acts on the option best meeting the circumstances. (Public Health Nursing
Section, 2001, pp. 165).
Three references recommended
consultation (Dempster, 1996; Free et al., 1990; Kenner & D'Apolito, 1997).
Recommendations included consultations with experts and specialists and
consultations for referral to daycare and transportation.
Advocacy.
Advocacy interventions plead someone's cause or act on someone's behalf with a
focus on developing the community, system, individual, or family's capacity to
plead their own cause or act on their own behalf. Advocacy is frequently used
with other interventions, such as referral and follow-up, community organizing,
and policy development and enforcement. Advocacy is often discussed in relation
to case management (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, pp. 263-264).
Seven references recommended
advocacy as a nursing intervention (Clement-Murphy, 2001; Cramer &
Davidhizar, 1999; Dychkowski, 2000; Eustace et al., 2003; Redding & Selleck,
1993; Robinson, 1999; Wekselman et al., 1995). Two articles made specific
recommendations: (a) nurses should advocate for individual patients and families
to find information and services; and (b) at the system level, nurses should
advocate for more treatment facilities for pregnant women who have alcohol
problems and for comprehensive services for families. One reference specifically
recommends advocating to eliminate the stigma of FAS.
Social Marketing.
Social marketing, a relatively new intervention first introduced in 1971,
utilizes commercial marketing principles and technologies for programs designed
to influence the knowledge, attitudes, values, beliefs, behaviors, and practices
of the population of interest (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 285). No
recommendations were made relating to social marketing.
Policy Development and
Enforcement. Policy
development and enforcement interventions help place health issues on decision
makers' agendas, acquire a plan of resolution, and determine needed resources.
Policy development results in laws, rules and regulations, ordinances, and
policies. Policy enforcement compels others to comply with the laws, rules,
regulations, ordinances, and policies created in conjunction with policy
development (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 313).
While many articles reviewed
made recommendations for nurses to become involved in policy development and
enforcement to prevent FASD, one article made a specific recommendation that
nurses need to be visibly involved on the legislative level to lobby for FAS
education and services for families affected by it (Robinson, 1999).
The majority of the evidence
for nursing interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in children and
families affected by FASD is Level VII evidence, opinion of authorities. The
literature review revealed no evidence-based nursing interventions to prevent
secondary disabilities in FASD but did show an increasing interest in this area.
By far, the most frequently mentioned interventions, even in those references
with recommendations for preventing secondary disabilities, were nursing
interventions to prevent the occurrence of FASD.
The majority of
recommendations for preventing secondary disabilities were in the areas of
referral and follow-up, screening, case-finding, health teaching, and case
management. Nurses working with children and families affected by FASD can
review the suggestions made in those areas and compare them with their practice.
For example, nurses need to have readily available a referral list of agencies
and practitioners who have an interest and expertise in dealing with the
problems associated with FASD. They should familiarize themselves with the
latest recommendations on identifying and screening for FASD in order to
identify populations in their communities at high risk for FASD. By reviewing
the suggestions under health teaching, nurses can identify the type of content
that should be included in teaching parents strategies that work with children
with FASD, including those that help the child maintain control and regain it
again when necessary. Finally, recommendations related to case management
highlight the need for this intervention and suggest activities that nurses can
undertake or refer their clients to another professional who can.
The analysis and synthesis
of this literature does suggest many examples of interventions that nurses
believe are necessary. This information will be instrumental in moving toward
evidence-based nursing interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in FASD.
Studying current intervention practices is one part of the model proposed by van
Meijel et al. (2004) for developing and testing complex nursing interventions,
especially those in which the clients play an important role. According to van
Meijel et al.:
The
primary goals of studying intervention practices are to identify the different
types of interventions that nurses are using, to describe how the different
types of interventions are used in practice, and to gain insight into the
experiences of providers and clients with available interventions (p. 88).
The analysis of current
practices related to nursing interventions identified here can be further
developed and refined using scientific methods (van Meijel et al., 2004). They
can then be combined with a review of the literature on the nature of the
problem (problem analysis) as experienced by children and families affected by
FASD as well as a review of the literature on the client's expressed needs and
requests for care. The studies by Clement-Murphy (2001), Free et al. (1990),
Gardner (2000), and Hess (1996) provide a starting point for understanding the
problems and needs as expressed by those affected by FASD. When combined with
the findings from other studies of problems and needs and this evidence-based
review of nursing interventions, the building blocks necessary to develop and
test nursing interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in FASD are in
place.
The Evidence-Based Practice
section focuses on: the search for and critical appraisal of the "best
evidence" to answer challenging clinical questions; single studies with
strong clinical practice applications; or evidence-based strategies to improve
practice so that the highest quality, up-to-date care can be provided to
children and their families. To obtain author guidelines or submit manuscripts,
please contact Bernadette Melnyk, PhD, RN, CPNP/NPP, FAAN, FNAP or Leigh Small,
PhD, RN-CS, PNP; Section Editors; Arizona State University College of Nursing;
PO Box 872602; Tempe, Arizona 85287-2602; 480-965-6431; Bernadette.Melnyk@asu.edu
or Leigh.Small@asu.edu
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to
acknowledge Sarah Judkiewicz; MS, PNP;, Sharon Murphy, Associate Librarian,
University at Buffalo; and the staff at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA) Center for Excellence on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum
Disorder (FASD) for their assistance with the initial literature search.
Linda
M. Caley, PhD,
RN, PNP, NNP, is Assistant Professor, School of Nursing,
University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Nancy Shipkey, MS, RN, PNP, is Doctoral Student and
Research Assistant, School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Theresa Winkelman, MS, RN, SNP, is Clinical Faculty,
School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Christine Dunlap, MS, CPNP, RN, graduated from
School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Sara Rivera, MS, CPNP, RN, is Doctoral Student and
Research Assistant, School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.